SYMPOSIUM TALKS
FIRST AUTHOR | TITLE | UNIVERSITY |
1. Adam Stivers | Indexing Prisoner’s Dilemma games: Quantifying psychological factors underling cooperative behavior | Gonzaga University |
2. Alan Fermin | Structural neural networks reveal prosocial and selfish economic motivations | Tamagawa University |
3. Alfred Zerres | Other regarding preferences in humans – focus on utility or appreciation? | University of Amsterdam |
4. Andreas Diekmann | Solving Social Dilemmas by Reputation Mechanisms | ETH Zurich |
5. Andrew Delton | Merely Opting Out of a Public Good Is Moralized: An Error Management Approach to Cooperation | Stony Brook Unviersity |
6. Angelo Romano | The Psychology of Intergroup Trust Across 17 Countries | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam & University of Turin |
7. Anthony Evans | Subjective and objective expectations of reciprocity in trust dilemmas | Tilburg University |
8. Aron Szekely | Self-governance sustains group-level reputation | Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies |
9. Athena Aktipis | The challenges of cheater detection in large-scale cooperation: From human societies to the evolution of multicellularity and cancer | Arizona State University |
10. Axel Burger | Are individuals on the right side of the political spectrum always less prosocial than individuals on the left? The role of the in- versus outgroup status of interaction partners | University of Mannheim Germany |
11. Bastian Jaeger | A face bias in trust decisions | Tilburg University |
12. Bruno Lambert | A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win. | University of Antwerp |
13. Cleotilde Gonzalez | Not all Prisoner’s Dilemma Games are Equal: Incentives, Social Preferences, and Cooperation | Carnegie Mellon University |
14. Daniel Sznycer | Support for redistribution is shaped by compassion, envy, and self-interest, but not a taste for fairness | University of California Santa Barbara and Arizona State University |
15. David Hugh-Jones | Expropriating free-riders and outsiders: theory, history and an experiment | University of East Anglia |
16. Diogo Ferreira | The social consequences of punishment: When third-party punishment signals morality and irrationality | Universidade Federal de Sergipe Brazil |
17. Dora Simunovic | Minority v. Majority – A Structural Goal/Expectation Theory of Intergroup Conflict | Bremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences BIGSSS |
18. Dorothee Mischkowski | From spontaneous cooperation to spontaneous punishment – Distinguishing the underlying motives driving spontaneous behavior in first and second order public goods | University of Hagen & University of Göttingen |
19. Eitan Adres | Social Dilemma and Provision of Public Good: The Case of the Mursi Tribe in South West Ethiopia | Samuel Neaman Institute for National Policy Research Technion Haifa Isreal |
20. Eliran Halali | Negative Brokerage: Understanding When, Why, and How Third Parties Divide and Conquer |
Bar Ilan University |
21. Eric van Dijk | Emotional Deception in Ultimatum Games | Leiden University |
22. Erik W. de Kwaadsteniet | The Effect of Decision Timing on the Willingness to Costly Reward Cooperation and Punish Non-Cooperation | Leiden University |
23. Giulia Andrighetto | Context and Individual Preferences Shape Cooperative Decision Making | European University Institute Florence Italy & Institute of Cognitive Science and Technologies Rome Italy |
24. Hannes Rusch | Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends. (John 15:13) | Philipps University Marburg |
25. Hendrik Bruns | Who cares who intervenes how? A framed field experiment on climate protection | International Max Planck Research School on Earth System Modeling & Department of Socioeconomics at the University of Hamburg |
26. Hildie Leung | Grateful or Indebted? Distinguishing gratitude from indebtedness and examining its impact on cooperation | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University |
27. Hillie Aaldering | Understanding parochial cooperation: Testing two theories | University of Amsterdam |
28. Ilana Ritov | Altruistic behavior in cohesive social groups: The role of target identifiability | The Hebrew University |
29. Isabel Thielmann | Deliberate thinking versus intuitive cooperation: On the role of processing mode for social mindfulness | University of Koblenz Landau |
30. Jörg Gross | Manipulation of Pro-Sociality and Rule Following with Non-invasive Brain Stimulation | Institute of Psychology Leiden University |
31. Jürgen Fleiß | The dynamics of group-specific social preferences in intergroup conflict. A nationwide incentivized experiment before and after the 2016 Austrian presidential election. | University of Graz |
32. Jan Kristian Woike | Promises and dice: Do people keep their word rather than their money? | Max Planck Institute for Human Development Center for Adaptive Rationality ARC |
33. Joseph Calabrisotto | It’s not you it’s me: how antecedent social decision-making impacts subsequent social behavior. | University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan United States |
34. Károly Takács | The Relative Importance of Direct and Indirect Reciprocity Strategies for the Emergence of Cooperation | MTA TK “Lendület” Research Center for Educational and Network Studies (RECENS), Hungarian Academy of Sciences |
35. Karthik Panchanathan | The co-evolution of group-level institutions and sustainable fisheries management through cultural group selection | University of Missouri |
36. Kimmo Eriksson | Cultural Universals and Cultural Differences in Meta-Norms about Peer Punishment | Mälardalen University and Stockholm University |
37. Kun Zhao | Individual differences in politeness and compassion differentially predict prosocial preferences and behaviors in economic games | The University of Melbourne |
38. Manfred Milinski | Humans choose representatives who enforce cooperation in the climate change game through extortion | Max Planck Institute for Evolutional Biology |
39. Misato Inaba | Which type of sanctioning institution is the most attractive and effective? | Hokkaido University |
40. Nils Köbis | Does honesty require time? A Meta-analysis | University of Amsterdam CREED Center for Research in Experimental Economics and political Decision making |
41. Ori Weisel | Selfish people don’t free ride on punishment | Tel Aviv University |
42. Paton Pak Chun Yam | What If the Group Had Not Failed: The Influence of Counterfactual Thinking and Emotions on Cooperation in Step-level Public Good Dilemma | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
43. Peter Martinsson | Triggering cooperation | University of Gothenburg Sweden |
44. Pontus Strimling | “My Way Only”-thinking in social dilemmas. | Institute of Future Studies Stockholm Sweden |
45. Rebecca Koomen | Common-pool magic water: an investigation into the social strategies of 6-year-old children in a resource dilemma | Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology |
46. Rob Nelissen | How Scarcity and Abundance affect Appropriation from common Resources | Tilburg University |
47. Robert Böhm | Disentangling Prosocial and Parochial Preferences: Laboratory and Field Evidence | RWTH Aachen University |
48. Sebastian Grueneisen | The role of interdependence in promoting fair resource divisions in children | Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology |
49. Shona Duguid | Coordinating decisions for cooperation: A comparative look at chimpanzee and human coordination | Max Planck Insititute for Evolutionary Anthropology |
50. Shuhei Tsuchida | A minimum set of factors necessary for the punishment and cooperation to evolve without the aid of cultural group selection | Hokkaido University |
51. Susann Fiedler | Ignorance as a tool of self-interest? | Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods |
52. Susanne Lohmann | Why Four Player Types?—And How They Fare in a Massively Multiplayer Game of Life Simulation | University of California Los Angeles |
53. Tamar Kugler | Greed is (Not Always) Good | University of Arizona |
54. Thomas Schlösser | When justice concerns do (not) matter – / How justice sensitivity predicts voter’s preferences for (un)equal wealth distributions within a simulated democratic system | Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology University of Cologne Germany |
55. Thomas Zagenczyk | Strong and Weak Ties at Work and Interpersonal Citizenship Behavior: Evidence of a Curvilinear Relationship | Clemson University USA |
56. Toko Kiyonari | Incentive-based decision synchrony may enhance voluntary cooperation in a one-shot social dilemma game but may not promote positive evaluation of other game players. | Aoyama Gakuin University |
57. Toshio Yamagishi | Institutions, Principles of Ethics, and Neuro-Psychological Adaptation Systems | Hitotsubashi University |
58. Welmer E. Molenmaker | Third party punishment in social dilemmas with heterogeneous and homogeneous populations | Leiden University |
59. Wojtek Przepiorka | Order without law: Reputation promotes cooperation in a cryptomarket for illegal goods | Utrecht University |
60. Yiming Jing | Dispositional Social Risk-Seeking Promotes Trusting Strangers: Evidence based on Attitudinal, Behavioral and Brain Data | University of Oklahoma |
61. Yiwen Wang | Social Value Orientation Modulates the Decision-making and Outcome Evaluation during Generalized Trust: Behavioral and Event-related Potentials Evidence | Institute of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences Fuzhou University Fujian China |
DEMONSTRATION TALKS
FIRST AUTHOR | TITLE | UNIVERSITY |
1. Arjaan Wit | Who are my fellow members in the groups to which I belong? Effects of group composition and fautlines on parochial cooperation | Social and Organisational Psychology Leiden University the Netherlands |
2. Dirk Semmann | Many relationships tempt you to cheat: Decreased cooperation in multiple prisoner’s dilemma | Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany |
3. Efrat Aharonov-Majar | The Effect of Experience on the Impact of Monetary Incentives in Social Networks | Carnegie Mellon University |
4. Frederic Moisan | The role of social preferences and recommendations in a game of conflict | University of Cambridge |
5. Fredrik Jansson | Using peer influence to solve the social dilemma of workplace segregation | Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution Stockholm University |
6. Gary Ting Tat Ng | Extension of Game Riskiness Model in Prisoner’s Dilemmas through Expected Utility Perspective | The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
7. Gianluca Grimalda | Pro-social and anti-social punishment in international collective risk social dilemmas | Institute for the World Economy |
8. Yen-Sheng Chiang | Does inequality influence altruism of the rich compared to the poor? Evidence from a lab experiment holding economic status constant |
The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
9. Ilan Fischer | On the Evolution and Learning of Strategic Similarity | University of Haifa |
10. Isamu Okada | Justification Dilemma in private observation and its solution | Soka University |
11. Job van der Schalk | Emotion expressions in intergroup resource dilemmas | School of Psychology Cardiff University |
12. Judith Kas | Steady steps versus sudden shifts: Cooperation in (a)symmetric continuous and step-level social dilemmas | Utrecht University |
13. Kim Peters | Understanding the Degree and Direction of Gossipers’ Lies: The Role of Incentive Alignment | University of Queensland |
14. Laetitia Mulder | Rules and personal gains | University of Groningen |
15. Leonie Fütterer | In My Backyard? Human Cooperativeness and the Causal Roles of Physical Proximity and Exposure | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology |
16. Nobuyuki Takahashi | Does trust beget trustworthiness?: The effect of trusting intention on trustworthiness of the partner | Hokkaido University |
17. Paul Van Lange | What explains donations at the doorstep, and norm violations, in the field? Reputation trumps resources | VU Amsterdam |
18. Philipp Gerlach | The games economists play: Why economics students behave more selfishly than other students | Max Planck institute for Human Development |
19. Poonam Arora | Context Matters: Moving Towards an Understanding of Person-Situation Influences on What I Do AND What I Want You to Do in Social Dilemmas | School of Business Manhattan College & CRED Columbia University |
20. Ramzi Suleiman | A Rational Economic Theory of Fairness | Department of Psychology University of Haifa & Department of Philosophy Al Quds University |
21. Stefan Pfattheicher | The Evolution of Cooperation via Democratic Punishment | Ulm University Germany |
22. Timothy Shields | Incentives, Truth, and Consequence | Chapman University Carnegie Mellon University |
23. Tom Gordon-Hecker | Not taking responsibility: Equity trumps efficiency in allocation decisions | Ben Gurion University of the Negev |
24. Victor Shiramizu | Implicit social categorization during intergroup competition | Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte |